Nuevo Usuario

Recordar Contraseña

Nutrición Hospitalaria 05819 / http://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.05819

Resumen| PDF (ENGLISH)

Trabajo Original

Association of socioeconomic status and nine modifiable lifestyle factors on esophageal cancer risk in European and East Asian populations — Evidence from a comprehensive Mendelian randomization study

Ruizhi Ye, Fengming Zhang, Guangxian You

Prepublicado: 2025-06-06

Logo Descargas Número de descargas: 512 Logo Visitas Número de visitas: 236 Citas Citas: 0

Compártelo:

Background and aims: the intricate relationships between socioeconomic factors, modifiable lifestyle choices, and esophageal cancer risk remain uncertain. We aim to investigate the associations of socioeconomic status, modifiable lifestyle factors, and esophageal cancer risk. Methods: we employed multiple Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses, including three different MR approaches. GWAS databases from European and East Asian populations, encompassing variables such as household income, educational attainment, and the Townsend deprivation index (TDI), were analyzed. The risk of esophageal cancer was assessed using data from three distinct cohorts of European and East Asian descent (Database 1: n = 476,306; Database 2: n = 372,756; Database 3: n = 160,589). Nine modifiable lifestyle factors were incorporated in the multivariable and mediation MR analyses. Meta-analysis was employed to synthesize results across the three datasets. Results: higher household income was connected with a reduced esophageal cancer risk (odds ratio (OR) = 0.698, 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 0.556-0.876, p = 0.002). Body mass index (BMI) partially mediated the relationship between household income and the risk of esophageal cancer (OR = 0.914, 95 % CI: 0.841-0.992, p = 0.031, mediation ratio: 27.23 %). However, no significant evidence was found to support a direct association between educational attainment, TDI, and esophageal cancer risk. Conclusions: these findings suggest that higher household income is inversely associated with esophageal cancer risk, with BMI acting as a partial mediator of this relationship. Accordingly, targeted early screening and preventive measures for esophageal cancer should be prioritized among low-income populations, particularly those with obesity.

Palabras Clave: Socioeconomic status. Modifiable lifestyle factors. Esophageal cancer. Mendelian randomization. Mediation effect.

Descargar PDF (ENGLISH)

Bibliografía
Artículos Relacionados

Waters JK, Reznik SI. Update on Management of Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2022;24(3):375-85.
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01153-4

Zhu H, Ma X, Ye T, Wang H, Wang Z, Liu Q, Zhao K. Esophageal cancer in China: Practice and research in the new era. Int J Cancer 2023;152(9):1741-51.
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34301

Li H, Teng Y, Yan X, Cao M, Yang F, He S, et al. Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e45360.
DOI: 10.2196/45360

Yang CS, Chen XL. Research on esophageal cancer: With personal perspectives from studies in China and Kenya. Int J Cancer 2021;149(2):264-76.
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33421

Tong X, Jin M, Wang L, Zhang D, Yin Y, Shen Q. Prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy in esophageal cancer. Front Immunol 2024;15:1420399.
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1420399

Ghosh NR, Jones LA. Dietary risk factors for esophageal cancer based on World Health Organization regions. Nutrition 2022;95:111552.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111552

Huang FL, Yu SJ. Esophageal cancer: Risk factors, genetic association, and treatment. Asian J Surg 2018;41(3):210-5.
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.10.005

Smyth EC, Lagergren J, Fitzgerald RC, Lordick F, Shah MA, Lagergren P, et al. Oesophageal cancer. Nature reviews Disease primers 2017;3:17048.
DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.48

Deboever N, Jones CM, Yamashita K, Ajani JA, Hofstetter WL. Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus. BMJ 2024;385:e074962.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074962

Li S, He Y, Liu J, Chen K, Yang Y, Tao K, et al. An umbrella review of socioeconomic status and cancer. Nat Commun 2024;15(1):9993.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54444-2

Abnet CC, Arnold M, Wei WQ. Epidemiology of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2018;154(2):360-73.
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.08.023

Delman AM, Ammann AM, Turner KM, Vaysburg DM, Van Haren RM. A narrative review of socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis 2021;13(6):3801-8.
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3095

Sardana RK, Chhikara N, Tanwar B, Panghal A. Dietary impact on esophageal cancer in humans: a review. Food Funct 2018;9(4):1967-77.
DOI: 10.1039/C7FO01908D

Williams J, Allen L, Wickramasinghe K, Mikkelsen B, Roberts N, Townsend N. A systematic review of associations between non-communicable diseases and socioeconomic status within low- and lower-middle-income countries. J Glob Health 2018;8(2):020409.
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.08.020409

Kaphingst KA, Peterson E, Zhao J, Gaysynsky A, Elrick A, Hong SJ, et al. Cancer communication research in the era of genomics and precision medicine: a scoping review. Genet Med 2019;21(8):1691-8.
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0402-0

Sommer I, Griebler U, Mahlknecht P, Thaler K, Bouskill K, Gartlehner G, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in non-communicable diseases and their risk factors: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Public Health 2015;15:914.
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2227-y

Pohl SA, Nelson BA, Patwary TR, Amanuel S, Benz EJ Jr, Lathan CS. Evolution of community outreach and engagement at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers, an evolving journey. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74(4):383-96.
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21841

Sekula P, Del Greco M F, Pattaro C, Köttgen A. Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;27(11):3253-65.
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2016010098

Yang Y, Chen B, Zheng C, Zeng H, Zhou J, Chen Y, Su Q, Wang J, Wang J, Wang Y, Wang H, Jin R, Bo Z, Chen G, Wang Y. Association of glucose-lowering drug target and risk of gastrointestinal cancer: a mendelian randomization study. Cell Biosci 2024;14(1):36.
DOI: 10.1186/s13578-024-01214-8

Goding Sauer A, Siegel RL, Jemal A, Fedewa SA. Current Prevalence of Major Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Test Use in the United States: Disparities by Education and Race/Ethnicity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019;28(4):629-42.
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1169

Zagkos L, Schwinges A, Amin HA, Dovey T, Drenos F. Exploring the contribution of lifestyle to the impact of education on the risk of cancer through Mendelian randomization analysis. Sci Rep 2024;14(1):6074.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54259-7

Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, Yarmolinsky J, Davies NM, Swanson SA, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement. JAMA 2021;326(16):1614-21.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236

Gibson MJ, Spiga F, Campbell A, Khouja JN, Richmond RC, Munafò MR. Reporting and methodological quality of studies that use Mendelian randomisation in UK Biobank: a meta-epidemiological study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023;28(2):103-10.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112006

Mbatchou J, Barnard L, Backman J, Marcketta A, Kosmicki JA, Ziyatdinov A, et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat Genet 2021;53(7):1097-103.
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00870-7

Liu M, Jiang Y, Wedow R, Li Y, Brazel DM, Chen F, et al. Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use. Nat Genet 2019;51(2):237-44.
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0307-5

Pirastu N, McDonnell C, Grzeszkowiak EJ, Mounier N, Imamura F, Merino J, et al. Using genetic variation to disentangle the complex relationship between food intake and health outcomes. PLoS Genet 2022;18(6):e1010162.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010162

Bowden J, Holmes MV. Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review. Res Synth Methods 2019;10(4):486-96.
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1346

Dudbridge F. Polygenic Mendelian Randomization. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2021;11(2):a039586.
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a039586

Boef AG, Dekkers OM, le Cessie S. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44(2):496-511.
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyv071

Burgess S, Thompson SG; CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40(3):755-64.
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyr036

Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R, Surendran P, Burgess S, Danesh J, et al. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics 2019;35(22):4851-3.
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz469

Sedgwick P. Multiple hypothesis testing and Bonferroni's correction. BMJ 2014;349:g6284.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g6284

Burgess S, Davies NM, Thompson SG. Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization. Genet Epidemiol 2016;40(7):597-608.
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21998

Allen L, Williams J, Townsend N, Mikkelsen B, Roberts N, Foster C, et al. Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5(3):e277-89.
DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30058-X

Schultz WM, Kelli HM, Lisko JC, Varghese T, Shen J, Sandesara P, et al. Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Challenges and Interventions. Circulation 2018;137(20):2166-78.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029652

Peng L, Wen WP. Socioeconomic status and asthma: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. World Allergy Organ J 2023;16(6):100790.
DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100790

Geng C, Meng K, Tang Y. Identifying the mediating role of inflammation on the relationship between socioeconomic status and Alzheimer's disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis and mediation analysis. J Neurol 2024;271(5):2484-93.
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-12176-1

Marino P, Mininni M, Deiana G, Marino G, Divella R, Bochicchio I, et al. Healthy Lifestyle and Cancer Risk: Modifiable Risk Factors to Prevent Cancer. Nutrients 2024;16(6):800.
DOI: 10.3390/nu16060800

Zhan ZQ, Chen YZ, Huang ZM, Luo YH, Zeng JJ, Wang Y, et al. Metabolic syndrome, its components, and gastrointestinal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 31 prospective cohorts and Mendelian randomization study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024;39(4):630-41.
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16477

Artículos más populares

Revisión: Disinformation about diet and nutrition on social networks: a review of the literature

Background: social networks have become indispensa...

Publicado: 2024-09-19

Resumen | PDF

Trabajo Original: Effect of the consumption of cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale l.) flour-based biscuits in overweight children: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Background: cashew nut is an almond known for its...

Publicado: 2024-03-25

Resumen | PDF

Revisión: Efectos del ayuno intermitente y el rendimiento deportivo: revisión narrativa

Recientemente, el ejercicio en ayunas ha generado...

Publicado: 2024-07-05

Resumen | PDF

Licencia creative commons: Open Access bajo la licencia Creative Commons 4.0 CC BY-NC-SA
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode

Editado en Madrid por:

Diseño y Desarrollo web Im3diA comunicación

Trabajo Original

Association of socioeconomic status and nine modifiable lifestyle factors on esophageal cancer risk in European and East Asian populations — Evidence from a comprehensive Mendelian randomization study

Artículos Relacionados:

Trabajo Original: Feasibility, safety and outcome of endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with esophageal cancer

Trabajo Original: Basal Energy Expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Trabajo Original: Inequalities in the association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and physical fitness in the young population during the COVID-19 lockdown

Trabajo Original: Body mass index and risk of inflammatory breast disease: a Mendelian randomization study

Revisión: Elemental diet preventative effects for adverse events during chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Trabajo Original: Causal effect of sarcopenia-related traits on the occurrence and prognosis of breast cancer - A bidirectional and multivariable Mendelian randomization study

Trabajo Original: Associations between dietary intake and sarcopenia: a Mendelian randomization study

Trabajo Original: Causal effects of vitamin D on leukemia risk: insights from two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

Trabajo Original: Higher frequency of adding salt to foods increases the risk of low bone mineral density in individuals over 60 - A Mendelian randomization study

Trabajo Original: Causal association of childhood body mass index with risk of endometrioid endometrial cancer — A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Trabajo Original: Causal relationship between tea intake and bone mineral density at different ages ̶ A Mendelian randomization study

Carta Editor: Aleatorización mendeliana en nutrición: el desafío de la diversidad poblacional

Trabajo Original: Food intake influences the incidence of cardiovascular disease by driving cardiac remodeling — Evidence from a Mendelian randomization

Artículos más populares

Revisión: Disinformation about diet and nutrition on social networks: a review of the literature

Trabajo Original: Effect of the consumption of cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale l.) flour-based biscuits in overweight children: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Revisión: Efectos del ayuno intermitente y el rendimiento deportivo: revisión narrativa